God save our bees!

Bees are dying at a frightening rate. Humankind - unkindly - is decimating biodiversity.

Bumble bee approaching borage plant. Bumble bee approaching borage plant. Photo: Vivian Grisogono

Bees are just one of the countless victims of relentless anti-ecological activities, including unwarranted, badly controlled use of chemical pesticides. These anti-nature policies are dictated by commercial and political interests. The world needs an urgent change of heart!

Can we do without bees and other pollinators?

Most people are aware that bees and all the other pollinators are vital for our natural resources, especially our food supply. It will be a surprise to many that bees have very little protection under existing international and European laws. This is shamefully, painfully noticeable in the regulations which are supposed to ensure that officially approved chemical pesticides are 'safe'. Insecticides are non-selective and, by definition, are extremely likely to cause harm to bees. Other types of pesticide also damage bees, for instance products based on glyphosate, probably the most widely used pesticidal substance in the world.

Very few pesticide labels warn of risks to bees. Why not?.

Authorities in the United Nations and the European Union have not paid much attention to the fate of bees over the last decades. Warnings of risks to bees are not included in the two leading lists of pesticide dangers. Rather odd, when one considers how many pesticides are known to be hazardous to our pollinators. But not so odd when one realizes just how flawed the system for chemical pesticide approval is, starting with the fact that approvals are based on industry-funded unpublished research, while contrary peer-reviewed independent studies are largely ignored until proven beyond doubt, many years later. Surely it should be the other way round?

Carpenter bee. Photo: Vivian Grisogono

Late awakening

The European Union authorities have woken up late to the fact that bees are essential and are not protected. In December 2020 that the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) published a summary of consultation feedback 'Preliminary considerations for ECHA's guidance on the "Methodology to assess the risk to bees and other non-target arthropod pollinators from the use of biocides" '. The document states (p.6): "In current available guidance on biocides only limited references are made to risk assessment for bees and other pollinators. The guidance states that no method is currently available on how to perform the risk assessment for bees and non-target arthropod pollinators for biocides." The document highlights the confusion caused by separating pesticides into 'plant protection products' and 'biocides', with different criteria for safety requirements, on the assumption that the former are used mainly outdoors and the latter mainly indoors - which is not the case. The practice of 'fogging', which is used several times every year throughout Croatia, involves spraying chemical pesticides defined as biocides from a road vehicle or aeroplane indiscriminately across the environment in towns and rural areas.

In May 2023 the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) published updated guidelines 'Revised guidance on the risk assessment of plant protection products on bees (Apis mellifera, Bombus spp. and solitary bees)'. Clearly the EU processes of improving theoretical measures for safeguarding bees are taking far too long. There is no sense of urgency, although the situation is critical.

Delays are costing bee lives

Pesticides have been implicated in bee losses for a long time, alongside other possible factors. Once chemical pesticides are authorized on the basis of industry-funded studies, it takes many long years for researchers to establish exact mechanisms of harm to bees and other pollinators from the various different substances. For instance, there was a focus on the damage being done by neonicotinoids, which eventually resulted in just three neonicotinoid insecticides being banned: the process took from 2013 to 2017, and even then the ban was not total. Meanwhile, it is clear that many other types of insecticide are damaging to bees, for instance sulphoxamine-based insecticides.

Bee losses: are scientific proofs needed?

Observation is quicker than scientific research and should be the leader of safety practices. A massive sudden loss of bees happened in April 2023 in Međimurje in northern Croatia when a permitted pyrethroid insecticide was used incorrectly. This was the third incident of massive bee losses in the region and there was no doubt about the link between the bee deaths and pesticide use. In a similar incident in 2022 the Agriculture Ministry confirmed that pesticide use was the culprit (links in Croatian).

The fogging practice which happens every year in Croatia is known to be harmful to bees, so it should be stopped. In June 2023 catastrophic bee losses followed aerial insecticide spraying near Osijek. Sadly, in vain so far, the Croatian Bee Association (Pčelarstvo.hr) and beekeepers have campaigned against the practice, pointing out that the fogging causes much harm and little if any benefit. (links in Croatian).

Even if there is only a suspected link between pesticides and bee losses, that should be enough to cause a revision of pesticide permits.

Bumble bee on bottle-brush flower. Photo: Vivian Grisogono

There ought to be a law...

Actually, there is a law. It's called the Precautionary Principle, which is supposed to protect the public and the environment from harm from any given policy or action. It is set out in Article 191 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). The Precautionary Principle is supposed to be applied to chemicals (Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — known as REACH). However, it has been largely ignored over the years when it comes to pesticide approvals. Indeed the opposite principle seems to prevail: assume a substance is harmless, delay reviews for as long as possible, only decide a product is dangerous when forced to by the weight of accumulated evidence.

Ensuing chaos

If the Precautionary Principle had been put into practice, a lot of harm could have been avoided. It's been taking far too long for dangerous substances to be banned, when clearly they should never have been approved in the first place. Even when they are banned, the bans are often only partial or unenforceable.

These are just a few examples of the failure to apply the Precautionary Principle:

- the system of 'candidates for substitution' is totally wrong as it allows the continued use of known dangerous substances until such time as a 'safer' alternative can be found. Not to mention that, given the flaws in the approvals system, the substitute may turn out to be as bad as, or even worse than its predecessor.

- Permethrin, a pyrethroid insecticide, was discovered in 1973 and is present in a wide variety of products, despite having serious possible adverse effects for humans and the environment. It was banned as a 'plant protection product' in December 2000, following a European Commission Review Report dated July 13th 2000 which stated "In conclusion from the assessments made on the basis of the submitted information, no plant protection products containing the active substance concerned [permethrin] is (sic) expected to satisfy in general the requirements laid down in Article 5 (1) (a) and (b) of Council Directive 91/414/EEC." However as a biocide it is approved until April 30th 2026. There are about 78 permethrin-based products on the Croatian Health Ministry listing of biocidal products (August 2022), some of which have been in regular use for fogging actions in Croatia over the years.

- Cypermethrin, also a pyrethroid insecticide, was first synthesized in 1974. It was re-approved as a 'plant protection product' from 01/02/2022 - 31/01/2029, on condition that it is not used when plants of any kind are in flower (legislation 24/11/2021). There are some 53 cypermethrin-based products on the Croatian Health Ministry listing of biocides. Despite serious possible health risks besides the known risks to pollinators, cypermethrin-based products are still used for fogging actions in Croatia in 2023.

- Lindane is an organochloride insecticide, acaricide and rodenticide. The chemical was first synthesized back in 1825. It was considered generally of 'no health concern' (World Health Organization, 1991), despite indications even then to the contrary. For many years it was widely produced and used as an insecticide until the 1990s in Europe. Its use in agriculture was banned in 2009. Lindane is potentially extremely harmful to bees, the environment and humans, but it is still allowed, especially in the United States, for restricted medical use in treating scabies and lice. Despite being banned in the European Union, a 2016 European Parliament study, 'Lindane, (persistent organic pollutant) in the EU', noted in the introductory abstract: "Its persistence, bioacumulative and toxic properties, spillages from former production sites and the illegal dumping of HCH-waste, have given rise to serious concerns.." Lindane was found through tests on hair samples in a female resident of Vrisnik and a male resident of Hvar Town on Hvar Island in July 2023.

Long researches and expressions of just concern  deserve a positive conclusion

At first sight it was puzzling that substances banned in the EU were being sprayed over the Island of Hvar and elsewhere in Croatia indiscriminately. It has taken about twelve years to piece together the extent of the problems relating to current levels of chemical pesticide use. When the local and national authorities were first questioned about the use of EU-banned products in the annual fogging actions on Hvar, the response was that the substances were authorized for this use and it was all 'perfectly safe'.

Now it is obvious that, together with the disastrous flaws in the approvals processes, the discrepancy between approvals of 'plant protection products' and biocides is adding to a growing environmental catastrophe, in which bee loss is just one of the symptoms. It's only just dawning on the EU authorities that bees are not being protected, after all the years in which they have been approving bee-harming pesticides.

It's up to the law makers and pesticide users to put all this right. It can be done. Destruction of our beautiful environment is not inevitable.

But while we're waiting, what else is there to do but pray?

"GOD SAVE THE BEES - AND US!"

© Vivian Grisogono, MA (Oxon), August 1st 2023

You are here: Home poisons be aware God save our bees!

Eco Environment News feeds

  • Scottish Water boss says average Scot uses 40% more water than people in Yorkshire partly due to mistaken belief water is abundant in Scotland

    Scottish households are being urged to cut back heavily on their water use and instead treat it as a precious resource due to the growing threat to supplies from climate heating.

    Alex Plant, the chief executive of Scottish Water, said the average Scot used 40% more water than consumers in Yorkshire, partly because there was a widespread but mistaken assumption that water was abundant in Scotland.

    Continue reading...

  • Critics say change in biodiversity protections would harm environmental recovery and make scheme ineffective

    Plans to weaken environmental regulations for small housebuilders would allow developers in England to build on an area the size of the Yorkshire Dales in the next 10 years without replacing the nature they destroy, according to analysis.

    Labour wants to remove the requirement for small housebuilders – those whose sites are under a hectare (2.5 acres) – to replace the nature they destroy under existing rules known as biodiversity net gain.

    Continue reading...

  • Exclusive: Restrictions on shot and bullets containing toxic metal to be phased in over three years from 2026

    Shotgun pellets and bullets that contain lead are to be banned for almost all uses, ministers have said, in a long-awaited announcement welcomed by wildlife groups.

    The restrictions will be phased in over three years from 2026, rather than the five set out in an official report last year, prompting some shooting organisations to say replacement ammunition may not be fully available in time.

    Continue reading...

  • With forests under pressure from drought, heat, disease and deer, a study has found fewer trees across a range of species surviving to maturity. But scientists say there is still hope

    To the untrained eye, Monks Wood looks healthy and lush in the summer sun. Hundreds of butterflies dance on the edge of footpaths in the ancient Cambridgeshire woodland, which is rich with ash, maple and oak trees. Birds flit through the hedgerows as they feed. A fox ambles through a forest clearing, before disappearing into long grass.

    But for a number of years, it has been clear to Bruno Ladvocat and Rachel Mailes that something is missing. In 2022, Ladvocat, Mailes and their research team from Birmingham University were out sampling when they noticed that the small trees that typically cover the woodland floor were increasingly hard to find.

    Continue reading...

  • A €5.5bn project has transformed the Emscher from ‘the sewer of the Ruhr’ to a place where nature is starting to flourish

    Strolling beside the Emscher, the Tyczkowskis say it is the stench that they remember most about the river’s darker days.

    “The whole thing was filthy and it stank terribly,” says the couple, a retired watchmaker and tax adviser in their 80s. Were they ever tempted to take a dip? “No,” they laugh in disgust. “There were other things swimming inside.”

    Continue reading...

  • In the days since the deadly floods in the Texas Hill Country, speculation has grown about whether cuts to US weather agencies may have contributed to the the number of casualties. Ian Sample talks to the meteorologist and climate journalist Eric Holthaus to find out whether this narrative stacks up and what the consequences could be for extreme weather prediction in the future

    Clips: NBC news, ABC news, Forbes, White House audio

    Texas floods reveal limitations of disaster forecasting under climate crisis

    Continue reading...

  • There’s no shortage of ideas for how to make air travel greener. But it has to start within the industry – and with workers

    I love flying. I’ve wanted to be a pilot since I was young. I grew up in Chichester, West Sussex, under a flight path used by Gatwick airport planes, and used to watch as they traversed the sky. In 2019, once I had qualified as an airline pilot, I began working for easyJet. Aviation connected me to my extended family in Canada, exposed me to different cultures and gave me an unforgettable career. But in November 2022, I handed over my airport ID card for the last time. I had grown increasingly anxious about the effect that our industry was having on the planet and, deep down, I knew that my concern for the climate crisis meant being an airline pilot was damaging my mental health.

    Despite no longer working in the industry, my love of aviation has driven me to protect our ability to fly for future generations. It inspires me to address the uncomfortable realities and decisions our industry now faces. Everyone knows that aviation has a gigantic emissions problem. In 2022, the UK’s domestic and international flights produced 29.6m tonnes of CO2 equivalent emissions, accounting for about 7% of total UK greenhouse gas emissions. This is projected to increase to 11% by 2030, because while other sectors are decarbonising, aviation emissions will remain stable or even increase.

    Continue reading...

  • With less congestion, less carbon pollution, less accidents, could it be a model for other US cities? Six months in, environmentalists say yes

    It has faced threats and lawsuits and even had its death proclaimed by Donald Trump as he startlingly depicted himself as a king in a social media post. But New York City’s congestion charge scheme for cars has now survived its first six months, producing perhaps the fastest ever environmental improvement from any policy in US history.

    New York vaulted into a global group of cities – such as London, Singapore and Stockholm – that charge cars for entering their traffic-clogged metropolitan hearts but also ushered in a measure that was unknown to Americans and initially unpopular with commuters, and was confronted by a new Trump administration determined to tear it down.

    Continue reading...

  • Exploring the magical landscape that inspired Narnia and stars as a location in Game of Thrones – just an hour outside of Belfast

    Where is the finest mountain panorama in the UK? As a nine-year-old I was taken up Yr Wyddfa (Snowdon) and told it was the best. Even in those days, it was a struggle to see much except the backs of other people. The following summer Scafell Pike got the same treatment and the next year we climbed Ben Nevis. I disagreed on all counts. For me, Thorpe Cloud in Dovedale was unbeatable, despite it being under a thousand feet tall. What convinced me was the diminutive Derbyshire peak’s shape: a proper pointy summit with clear space all around, plus grassy slopes that you could roll down. The champion trio could not compare.

    This panorama question is in my mind as I begin hiking up Slieve Donard, Northern Ireland’s highest peak (at 850 metres), but a mountain often forgotten by those listing their UK hiking achievements. And a proper peak it is too, with a great sweeping drop to the sea and loads of space all around, guaranteeing, I reckon, a view to beat its more famous rivals.

    Continue reading...

  • Shanxi produces more coal than India. How will it survive in China’s clean energy future?

    Deep in the recesses of an underground cavern, covered in dust and soot, Xu Xiaobo wondered why, having recently graduated with a degree in mechanics, he was on his hands and knees sifting through layers of coal sludge. But there was no time to ponder the ancestral forces that had brought him down into one of his province’s oldest mines. There was coal to dig for.

    New to the job, keeping up with colleagues was challenging. As he tried to crawl at speed under a conveyor belt of coal, he landed badly and sprained his wrist. He still can’t rotate it properly.

    Continue reading...

Eco Health News feeds

Eco Nature News feeds