Eco Hvar

Pesticide chaos: action urgently needed!

Towards the end of 2023, the European Parliament and the European Commission showed that they are not willing or able to protect European citizens from the ill-effects of chemical pesticides. So what needs to be done?

Pesticide chaos: action urgently needed!

It's now up to governments, national and local responsible authorities and above all individual citizens to take action. These are our suggestions to the Croatian and EU authorities.

IT IS VITAL THAT ALL THE RELEVANT MINISTRIES AND NATIONAL INSTITUTIONS SHOULD ACT ACCORDING TO THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE, WHICH IS FUNDAMENTAL TO EUROPEAN UNION LAW and THE HUMAN RIGHT TO A CLEAN, HEALTHY AND SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENT ADOPTED BY THE UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL ON OCTOBER 21st 2021

WHAT WE ASK OF HVAR’S LOCAL AUTHORITIES

CHEMICAL PESTICIDES ARE CAUSING UNTOLD DAMAGE ON HVAR, HARMING HUMAN HEALTH, WILDLIFE AND THE ENVIRONMENT. THIS IS ALSO HAVING A BAD IMPACT ON TOURISM. A BIG PART OF THE PROBLEM IS THE PEST CONTROL PROGRAMME, WHICH LOCAL AUTHORITIES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR, FOLLOWING THE DIRECTIVES FROM THE NATIONAL AND REGIONAL HEALTH INSTITUTES. THE ROUTINE COSTS ARE COVERED FROM LOCAL REVENUES. OVER MANY YEARS, THE ACTIONS HAVE PROVED UNSATISFACTORY IN PRACTICE.

Therefore we recommend:

1. environmentally friendly methods of agriculture and pest suppression should be encouraged, chemical pesticide use should be discouraged;

2. ecological measures for pest suppression should be used instead of relying solely on chemical pesticides;

3. there should be more public education about the adverse effects of pesticides and the better, environmentally-friendly methods for protecting people and the environment from unwanted pests such as mosquitoes and unwanted plants / weeds;

4. the Health Institute’s two documents (the Programme and Implementation Plan for Pest Suppression) should cover the whole of Hvar island with the cost shared between each of the four local authorities, instead of each paying separately for the same information;

5. monitoring of the target pests should be the compulsory basis of all pest suppression measures, and the results of the monitoring before and after such measures should be recorded and made available to the public;

6. blanket fogging actions should be avoided because of the risks to bees and people, especially people with certain health problems;

7. if blanket fogging is planned, the exact route and timing should be publicized;

8. biocides which have been banned by the EU as ‘plant protection products’ because they are proven to be dangerous for the environment, especially for aquatic organisms and bees, should not be used for insect suppression outdoors, especially not in blanket fogging actions;

9. all pest suppression actions, especially fogging, should be carried out strictly according to the relevant legal regulations and by-laws;

10. the public should be informed in advance in Croatian and other languages of planned insect suppression measures (larvicide and adulticide), using not only public announcements but also the same channels (post and email) used by local authorities to send out bills;

11. if biocides are to be used, they should be named, together with their possible adverse effects;

12. beekeeping organizations at national and local level should be informed in advance of all insect suppression actions everywhere in Croatia;

13. raticides should only be distributed on request, and a record should be kept of the recipients;

14. raticides should be used within secure applicators with access just big enough for mice or rats, to protect people, especially children, and other non-target animals, especially pets;

15. the raticide applicators should be collected after use by the company which distributes them;

16. all chemical pesticide packaging should be disposed of responsibly at designated collection points.

WHAT WE ASK OF THE CROATIAN NATIONAL AND REGIONAL HEALTH INSTITUTES

THE NATIONAL AND REGIONAL HEALTH INSTITUTES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION OF MEASURES RELATING TO THE LAW CONCERNING PROTECTING THE POPULATION AGAINST TRANSMISSIBLE DISEASES (NN 143/21 čl.5, law in Croatian). MEASURES LAID DOWN BY THE HEALTH INSTITUTES ARE PROVING UNSATISFACTORY IN PRACTICE. THEREFORE WE RECOMMEND:

1. risk assessments should be the basis for instigating preventive measures such as pest suppression, in particular the actual risk of specific diseases, as well as the risk of collateral damage if chemical pesticides are to be used;

2. all pest suppression actions, especially fogging, should be carried out strictly according to the relevant legal regulations and by-laws:

3. monitoring of target pests should be the compulsory basis of all pest suppression measures, and the results of the monitoring before and after such measures should be recorded and made available to the public;

4. ecological measures for pest suppression should be used instead of relying solely on chemical pesticides;

5. biocides which have been banned by the EU as ‘plant protection products’ because they are proven to be dangerous for the environment, especially for aquatic organisms and bees, should not be used for insect suppression, especially not in fogging actions;

6. the public should be informed in advance of planned insect suppression measures, using public announcements and also the same channels used by local authorities to send out bills;

7. the biocides to be used should be named, together with their possible adverse effects;

8. beekeeping organizations at national and local level should be informed in advance of all insect suppression actions everywhere in Croatia;

9. blanket fogging actions should be avoided because of the risks to bees and people, especially people with certain health problems;

10. if blanket fogging is planned, the exact route and timing should be publicized;

11. if people complain about mosquitoes, they should be given educational leaflets about how to protect themselves and their environment, also about the collateral damage caused by chemical pesticides;

12. raticides should only be distributed on request, and a record should be kept of the recipients;

13. raticides should be used within secure containers, which should be collected after use;

14. all pest suppression actions should be closely controlled by the Health Institutes;

15. the Health Institute reports following the actions should not just rubber-stamp information from the implementing companies, but should be based on observation on the ground.

WHAT WE ASK OF THE CROATIAN MINISTRY OF HEALTH

IN RELATION TO THE LAW CONCERNING PROTECTING THE POPULATION AGAINST TRANSMISSIBLE DISEASES (NN 143/21 law in Croatian) WE RECOMMEND:

1. consistent coordination between the Ministry of Health and the Ministry of Agriculture, in particular in order to avoid using biocides for insect suppression which have been banned by the EU as ‘plant protection products’ because they are proven to be dangerous for the environment, especially for aquatic organisms and bees;

2. the list of approved biocides on the Ministry website should be a detailed database which is updated regularly, like the Phytosanitary Information System list of approved pesticides on the Ministry of Agriculture website;

3. that all insect suppression actions, especially fogging, should be carried out strictly according to the relevant legal regulations and by-laws;

4. that the results of monitoring should be the sole basis of any and all actions for suppressing mosquitoes;

5. that publicizing all the possible adverse effects of biocidal products should be made compulsory;

6. that testing for the presence of pesticides should be an integral part of all systematic preventive health check-ups.

WHAT WE ASK OF THE CROATIAN MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE

We recommend:

1. the Ministry should press for risks to bees to be added to the primary hazard warnings for pesticide labelling in the listings issued by the United Nations and the European Union;

2. all information and recommendations regarding chemical 'plant protection products' should always list in full the possible adverse effects and collateral damage they can cause:

3. possible adverse effects of so-called 'plant protection products' should be the first part of the information given on the Phytosanitary Information System (FIS) listing of approved substances and products;

4. organic agricultural methods should be given priority in the Ministry's regular expert technical advice bulletins for farmers;

5. agriculture based on alternative methods other than chemical pesticide and fertilizer use should be a major focus in the education of agronomists;

6. organic agricultural methods should be prioritized and promoted with a raft of incentives, as the best way to preserve Croatia's natural environment and improve public health;

7. chemical pesticides should not be the primary recommendation issued by the Ministry for dealing with pests or other hazards in agriculture;

8. controlled disposal of chemical pesticide packaging and obsolete pesticides should be made more publicly accessible in all parts of Croatia and should be subject to stricter monitoring;

9. the Ministry of Agriculture in collaboration with the Ministry of Health should initiate and support more research into the possible ill-effects of combinations of chemical pesticides on the environment and human health;

10. chemical substances used at each stage of agricultural production, from seed to finished produce, should be logged and listed when the produce is placed on the market, in accordance with the European Commission's stated safety aims;

11. the Ministry should help to ensure that any advertisements for pesticide products in any media should conform to the rules laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008, Title VII, Article 48:

12. the Ministry of Agriculture in collaboration with the Ministry of Health should press the European Commission to end the distinction between 'plant protection products' and biocides, in order to put an end to the unacceptable use of biocides for general outdoor insect suppression which have been banned by the EU as ‘plant protection products’ because they are too dangerous for the environment, especially for aquatic organisms and bees.

We recommend that the following factors should be taken into account, honoured and enacted:

1. Pesticide authorizations should be based on independent research published in peer-reviewed journals, not just on industry-funded unpublished studies as at present;

2. substances already in use which have been proven to be harmful to humans, animals, wildlife and/or the environment should be banned without delay, i.e. withdrawn from the market with immediate effect without any grace period for using up stocks, and any stocks held by end-users should be collected for appropriate safe disposal;

3. risks to bees should be included among the primary hazard warnings in pesticide labelling;

4. all the possible adverse effects of individual pesticides should be clearly stated and prioritized over suggested uses for the substances, a) on the pesticide product packaging, b) in any related product advertising, c) on treated end-products to include every part of the production process (eg from seed treatments to treated packaging);

5. the distinction between biocides and ‘plant protection products’ should be abolished: at the least substances banned or limited in one category should also be banned or limited in the other;

6. the policy of allowing ‘candidates for substitution’ to continue to be used despite having been shown to be harmful should be abolished and replaced by an immediate ban;

7. re-evaluation of authorized pesticide substances should begin long enough before the expiry date to be completed in time: the practice of granting automatic extensions if the Member State rapporteur fails to conclude the process by the due date should be abolished: substances should be banned until the re-evaluation processes are concluded;

8. the will of EU citizens regarding pesticide use as expressed in European Citizen Initiatives such as ‘Ban glyphosate and protect people and the environment from toxic pesticides’ (2017) and ‘Save Bees and Farmers’ (2023) should be taken into account, fully respected and enacted;

9. regular testing of people and the environment for chemical pesticide contamination in Member States, together with publication of the results, should be a mandatory component underpinning the award and retraction of authorizations.

WHAT WE ASK OF THE EUROPEAN DECISION-MAKERS

We recommend that the following factors should be taken into account, honoured and enacted:

1. Pesticide authorizations should be based on independent research published in peer-reviewed journals, not just on industry-funded unpublished studies as at present;

2. substances already in use which have been proven to be harmful to humans, animals, wildlife and/or the environment should be banned without delay, i.e. withdrawn from the market with immediate effect without any grace period for using up stocks, and any stocks held by end-users should be collected for appropriate safe disposal;

3. risks to bees should be included among the primary hazard warnings in pesticide labelling;

4. all the possible adverse effects of individual pesticides should be clearly stated and prioritized over suggested uses for the substances, a) on the pesticide product packaging, b) in any related product advertising, c) on treated end-products to include every part of the production process (eg from seed treatments to treated packaging);

5. the distinction between biocides and ‘plant protection products’ should be abolished: at the least substances banned or limited in one category should also be banned or limited in the other;

6. the policy of allowing ‘candidates for substitution’ to continue to be used despite having been shown to be harmful should be abolished and replaced by an immediate ban;

7. re-evaluation of authorized pesticide substances should begin long enough before the expiry date to be completed in time: the practice of granting automatic extensions if the Member State rapporteur fails to conclude the process by the due date should be abolished: substances should be banned until the re-evaluation processes are concluded;

8. the will of EU citizens regarding pesticide use as expressed in European Citizen Initiatives such as ‘Ban glyphosate and protect people and the environment from toxic pesticides’ (2017) and ‘Save Bees and Farmers’ (2023) should be taken into account, fully respected and enacted;

9. regular testing of people and the environment for chemical pesticide contamination in Member States, together with publication of the results, should be a mandatory component underpinning the award and retraction of authorizations.

November 2023.

back to top
You are here: Home poisons be aware Pesticide chaos: action urgently needed!

Eco Environment News feeds

  • As the UK prepares its next carbon budget, what needs to be included?

    Expert recommendations will influence plans for energy, housing, transport industry and farming for decades

    Labour will next week be confronted with stark policy choices that threaten to expose the fault lines between the Treasury and the government’s green ambitions, as advice for the UK’s next carbon budget is published.

    Plans for the energy sector, housing, transport, industry and farming will all be called into question in a sweeping set of recommendations for how the UK can meet the legally binding target of net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.

    Continue reading...

  • Young country diary: A sky full of geese is an awe-inspiring sight

    North Norfolk: Every morning, an endless flow of pink-footed geese passes overhead. Their comings and goings define the day

    The first thing you hear is a raucous cacophony in the distance, ebbing and flowing. Then the first small specks appear, and soon the sky is filled with a seemingly never-ending flow of geese.

    These are pink-footed geese, who migrate to north Norfolk at the start of winter along with hundreds of thousands of other geese. They come here to escape the harsh winters of Siberia, Iceland and Greenland, where they breed. Norfolk has an abundance of food compared to the Arctic: leaves, berries, seeds and crop remains.

    Continue reading...

  • Brazilian city in Amazon declares emergency after huge sinkholes appear

    In Buriticupu, about 1,200 people risk losing their homes, and residents have seen the problem escalate in 30 years

    Authorities in a city in the Brazilian Amazonhave declared a state of emergency after huge sinkholes opened up, threatening hundreds of homes.

    Several buildings in Buriticupu, in Maranhão state, have already been destroyed, and about 1,200 people of a population of 55,000 risk losing their homes into a widening abyss.

    Continue reading...

  • Outcry as Trump withdraws support for research that mentions ‘climate’

    US government stripping funds from domestic and overseas research amid warnings for health and public safety

    The Trump administration is stripping away support for scientific research in the US and overseas that contains a word it finds particularly inconvenient: “climate.”

    The US government is withdrawing grants and other support for research that even references the climate crisis, academics have said, amid Donald Trump’s blitzkrieg upon environmental regulations and clean-energy development.

    Continue reading...

  • Rolling back on climate actions may spell rise in preventable illness – study

    Net zero policies would result in fewer deaths saving UK billions, say researchers

    Countries that weaken or stop their net zero and climate actions may be consigning their populations to decades of preventable illness.

    Gains from net zero are often presented as global benefits and mainly for future generations. But less fossil fuel use also means less air pollution which results in local health gains right away.

    Continue reading...

  • Dark side of bright nights taking toll on forgotten invertebrates

    From bats to moths, species working the night shift are suffering as light pollution soars

    When we think about invertebrates, most of us picture bees, butterflies, worms, crabs or perhaps even a jellyfish. But did you know that at least two-thirds of invertebrates are active at night, meaning many are unlikely to be seen? Invertebrates carry out many of the same functions as their daytime counterparts, in some cases doing so with greater efficiency and variety.

    For centuries, artificial light has been a symbol of progress. From the flickering flames of early fires to the dazzling LED displays of modern cities, light has shaped human civilisation. But while we celebrate its convenience, we often overlook the darker side of our obsession with illumination: light pollution.

    The Guardian is running theinvertebrate of theyear competition 2025 – and this time it’s global.Nominate your favourite invertebrate, and then, in a few weeks time, we’ll vote on which is the best.

    Continue reading...

  • ‘To say there’s no future is counterproductive’: metal megastars Architects on grief, climate and hope for humanity

    Consumed by anger and still mourning a brother and bandmate, the British quartet have written their masterpiece. They explain how they’re fighting self-loathing and trying to age responsibly

    In a world of low royalties and short attention spans, not many bands make it to 11 albums, much less have their 11th be their masterpiece. But over the course of 20 years, the metalquartet Architects have inched towards this milestone. The Sky, the Earth & All Between sets out its scale in its title, where gigantic pop choruses soar over hellish chasms of churning noise, resulting in the most consistently sublime British rock album of this decade. The band are now at their arena-filling, Metallica-supporting peak, adored by millions.

    “But it means nothing,” says frontman, Sam Carter. “Because you don’t believe it. If you can’t access that part of you that lets it in, then it’s pointless.” Drummer and lyricist, Dan Searle, is equally downcast. “I punish myself, I loathe myself,” he says evenly, blinking behind his glasses. “I feel like I’m shit at everything.” Across two decades, the band have been buffeted by poor mental health, creative differences and an instance of particularly traumatic grief. While the pair are quick to joke during our long conversation in a London photo studio, and are clearly ravenously ambitious, I have never met a rock band as candid about their frailties.

    Continue reading...

  • The EPA weighed two LA beachfront sites for toxic waste sorting. These ‘hippies and hicks’ revolted

    Residents in Topanga Canyon – an area of Indigenous heritage and artists – mobilized against the state’s decision to bring in hazardous materials after wildfires

    Twenty years ago, it was called Rodeo Grounds – an eclectic neighborhood of artists, musicians and surfers living in beach shacks where Topanga Canyon meets the Pacific Ocean. In a bizarre agreement with the former owner some paid as little as $100 a month for rent, raising multiple generations of their families here since the 1950s. But that was before the state purchased the property and started evicting residents in 2001. Julie Howell, who once owned Howell-Green Fine Art Gallery further up in the canyon, says the bohemians were kicked out.

    “I actually had a show in my gallery 20 years ago for the group of artists who lived there at Rodeo Grounds, who they kicked out of that spot because it was so environmentally sensitive,” says Howell.

    Continue reading...

  • ‘If not fire, we’ll be killed by hunger’: villagers continue to feel fallout from Bolivia’s worst wildfires

    Residents battle food shortages and health issues after vast areas of forest and farmland burned last year

    As she walks away from the house where she raised her family, Isabel Surubí pauses to point at the bed of a stream, now covered with dry leaves, that once supplied her entire community. “The water used to come from here,” she says.

    In 2024, wildfires in Bolivia burned more than 10m hectares (about 39,000 sq miles) of forest, farmland and savannah – an area greater than the size of Portugal. After the fires, and the drought that preceded them, the spring feeding Surubí’s village of Los Ángeles in Bolivia’s tropical dry forest ran dry.

    Continue reading...

  • ‘Our community deserves beauty’: one man’s mission to green a UK tree desert

    In Grimsby, locals have created a society focused on the environmental and health benefits more trees provide, planting thousands in schools, parks and hedgerows

    Billy Dasein was born on Rutland Street, Grimsby, in the front room of the house where he still lives. His father was a fitter, and his mother a housewife who also worked in the Tickler’s jam factory. He left school at 16 and wound up working at Courtauld’s synthetic textiles factory.

    Rows of terrace houses, constructed for workers in the booming fish industry, are set out in a grid structure by the docks. Life was similar on all these streets: doors left unlocked, kids out playing. Everyone knew everyone.

    Continue reading...

Eco Health News feeds

Eco Nature News feeds

Copyright © 2025 Eco Hvar. All Rights Reserved. Developed by Orion Informatika.