Property purchase

Objavljeno u Informacije

Owning a piece of paradise in beautiful places like Hvar Island can give you a dream home - but, done wrongly, it can be a nightmare!

Property buying in Croatia used to be a relatively straightforward affair. A single lawyer might represent both seller and buyer in preparing the sales contract, and subsequently securing the buyer's ownership on the Land Registry. The same lawyer might also act as estatte agent, matching potential buyers with local vendors. By and large, the system worked well, with honesty, integrity and transparency on all sides.

In the early days of Croatian independence after 1990, foreigners were not allowed to buy residential properties or land plots in the Republic. As always in Croatia, there were ways around the restriction. Foreigners determined to buy could make long-term 'leasing' agreements, usually over 99 years, with a clause stipulating that the agreement would become a sales contract at such time as foreigners were allowed to own property in the country. Another possibility was to buy in the name of a trusted Croatian friend. At the beginning of the noughties, the situation changed, and foreigners were allowed to own property under certain conditions. Firstly, there had to be reciprocal agreement between Croatia and the buyer's home country: if Croatians were not allowed to buy property there, conversely citizens of that country could not buy in Croatia. Eligible individuals had to seek Ministry permission, a process which could take many months during a phase when two Ministries were involved. To avoid this, or if potential buyers were not eligible for the permission for some reason (for instance a criminal record in their home country), they could form a Croatian company and buy their property in the company name. This process had some drawbacks, not least the need to file detailed accounts annually, and the risk that the property would be lost if the bureaucratic procedures were not totally fulfilled year on year. Apart from that, closing down a company is a protracted and expensive business in Croatia.

In 2019 it is still the case that property ownership by foreigners depends on reciprocity agreements. For American citizens, some states do have reciprocity with Croatia, others don't. You can find a list of countries and American states which have agreements on the official website, which gives information (in Croatian) on how foreigners can apply to own property in Croatia. The website was updated in October 2018. In the right-hand panel under 'Dokumenti' is a Word document with the current list, which you click on to download. It too is in Croatian. The categories are 'uzajamnost postoji' - 'reciprocity exists'; 'bez ograničenja' - 'unlimited'; 'uzajamnost postoji uz uvjet stalnog boravka u Republici Hrvatskoj' - 'reciprocity exists on condition that the applicant has permanent residence in Croatia'; 'uzajamnost ne postoji' - 'no reciprocity'; 'utvrđivanje u tijeku' - 'confirmation in process';  and various other conditions and restrictions are detailed. The American states which have reciprocity are listed under 'SAD' (Sjedinjenje Američke Države'). For eight states at the end of the list, ownership is conditional on permanent residence.  

There were all sorts of pitfalls for the unwary or naive foreign buyer, and 'caveat emptor' still applies. Unscrupulous sellers and a few lawyers spotted the chance to make money selling properties which did not have clean title, among other unsavoury tricks. They were helped by the fact that property ownership was often not kept up to date in the Land Registry records. Sometimes properties were inherited among family members who simply did not bother to register the changes formally, as everyone knew what belonged to whom. Some cases involved outright fraud, with people selling properties to which they had no claim whatsoever. A suspicious buyer would be reassured by promises that the papers would be cleaned up 'quickly'. The smooth promise of "No problem / nema problema" should be a warning to any buyer that there could be years (or an infinity) of legal struggle ahead, with no guarantee of the right outcome. And then there were cases of people selling properties which had been built illegally, or selling non-residential structures as residential. Although sales contracts were (and are) supposed to be translated for foreign buyers, it is surprising how many did not insist on this, often falling victim to crafty changes between their precontract and the final sales contract. Estate agents were not regulated in the early days, so one could not always rely on them to provide correct information for safeguarding the buyer. To name but a few of the hazards.

What the buyer needs to know

All properties have a plot number, which may be a land plot (čestica zemljišta) or a plot with a building on it (čestica zgrade). Properties should have clear title, and any necessary permits or certificates, such as a Usage Permit (Uporabna dozvola) and Energy Certificate (Energetski certifikat). The requirements change from time to time.

The Land Registry (Zemljišna knjiga) holds the records of current and past owners of all Croatian properties. Proof of ownership is an up-to-date officially stamped Ownership Document (Vlasnički list), which also gives details of any charges on a property, or shared facilities such as access through rights of way. The Ownership Document also shows if there are any Court proceedings in hand relating to the property, for instance Probate procedures for inheritance, or any disputes which might affect the ownership.

The Cadastar (Katastar) in each region of Croatia holds the maps showing all properties, with details of where specific plots are situated, their boundaries, and how big each plot is. The Cadastar issues a Possession Document (Posjedovni list) showing who is using the plot. This should tally with the Ownership Document, but sometimes does not.

Nowadays, as a first step, one can check whether a property has clear title online on the Land Registry and Cadastar websites (detailed instructions in English are given in these linked articles). This will reveal straight away if there are potential problems concerning the property being offered for sale. However, it is not foolproof, and does not provide a definitive proof of ownership, as the internet entries are not always completely up to date. Internet print-offs (like unverified photocopies) are anyway not valid for Court purposes.

A potential buyer should check whether he/she has the right to own property in Croatia. Croatia's entry into the European Union in 2013 simplified the issues for most EU citizens, but there are still many countries in the world whose citizens do not have the automatic right to individual property ownership. Ownership of agricultural land is srill restricted for foreigners, but that is set to change for EU citizens in the next few years.

When a sale is agreed, there is normally a Precontract (Predugovor), on the basis of which a deposit is paid. The buyer can nominate a lawyer to sign the contract on his/her behalf through a Power of Attorney (Punomoć). It is wise not to pay any monies at all, unless it is certain that the sale can proceed without delay to the final contract (Kupoprodajni ugovor). When the final contract is signed, the seller's signature has to be verified by the Notary Public (Javni bilježnik). The buyer can sign the Contract in advance. Once both parties have signed, the final part of the purchase price is paid to the seller, either directly or through a bank.

The lawyer acting for the buyer then presents the Contract to the Tax Office (Porezna uprava), which will bill the buyer for 5% of the purchase price. If the tax authorities consider the purchase price on the Contract to be too low, they will estimate the property value according to their own tariff. Once the tax demand has been issued, it has to be paid promptly. If the Tax is paid late, interest will accrue, which can mount up alarmingly if left unchecked. The Tax Office does not notify late-payers of the continuing liability until it gets to the stage of issuing Court orders for payment. By that time the interest will have been augmented by costs. Therefore, once the Purchase Tax has been paid, it is wise to check with the Tax Office that the debt has been fully cleared.

The buyer's lawyer also simultaneously presents the sales Contract and supporting documents to the Land Registry for entry into the books. Payment of the Purchase Tax does not guarantee that the application will be accepted. However, if due care has been taken over the purchase, registration is simply a matter of time. Once the buyer has been registered as official owner of the property, the last step is to register Possession in the Cadastar. This is straightforward, but if the buyer has no-one to help with the language, it is best to engage the lawyer to carry out this task too - it doesn't happen automatically.  

© Vivian Grisogono MA(Oxon) 2016, updated 2017, 2019.

Nalazite se ovdje: Home Property ownership

Eco Environment News feeds

  • Campaigners in Henley say insufficient number of bathers to qualify for status is result of poor water quality

    Bathing water rules in England should be improved to help drive a clean-up of pollution at a spot on the River Thames in Henley, campaigners say.

    In a letter to the environment secretary, Emma Reynolds, businesses, river users, community groups and civic leaders said poor water quality had been damaging the town and had put public health at risk.

    Continue reading...

  • Brussels will relax state aid rules to allow member countries to offer ‘targeted and temporary’ support

    The EU will cut electricity taxes and provide consumers with fresh incentives to ditch fuel-burning cars and boilers, the European Commission has announced, as the energy crisis from the Iran war speeds a shift to a clean economy.

    The plan, which foresees tweaking rules so that electricity is taxed less than oil and gas, aims to bring down bills while encouraging the move away from polluting devices that prolong reliance on foreign fuels.

    Continue reading...

  • Council proposal to use glyphosate to tidy up pavements criticised over potential harm to humans and wildlife

    Cornwall is famed for its glorious gardens and verdant landscapes but a bitter row has broken out over a plan to tackle a less glamorous type of vegetation – roadside weeds.

    The unitary authority has announced plans to use the controversial herbicide glyphosate to tidy up pavements and kerbsides, after largely phasing out its use over the last decade amid concerns about potential harm to humans and the peninsula’s rich ecosystems.

    Continue reading...

  • Unwanted vessels left to decay release fibreglass shards into the water, harming marine life. Steve Green – with his trusty van Cecil – is determined to clean things up

    Steve Green, a boat engineer from Cornwall, was pulled over by the police just before Christmas. He was driving a decrepit-looking VW campervan and towing an even more dilapidated yacht up to Truro. He hadn’t broken any laws, but he admits that Cecil the campervan, which runs on donated chip oil from local pubs and has a crane and a winch on the front, “wasn’t quite what VW intended”.

    Green (and Cecil) are on a mission to rid the beautiful hidden creeks of Cornwall’s Helford and Fal rivers of 166 abandoned fibreglass yachts, which are leaking plastic and toxins into the predominantly marine waters. Marine biologists have likened the thousands of shards of fibreglass they have found embedded in the flesh of sea-creatures in areas with wrecks such as these to asbestos, a substance known to have a noxious effect on humans.

    Green uses a detachable crane system at the front of his van to move around bags of plastic after they have been weighed. Cecil is upholstered in recycled denim

    Continue reading...

  • Fiona Harvey tells Nosheen Iqbal why the climate crisis is a threat to national security

    “Last October, I and other journalists got quite excited because we thought that we were going to be attending a great event at the Natural History Museum,” the Guardian’s environment editor Fiona Harvey tells Nosheen Iqbal.

    “We had been told that there was a major report being launched at this event. And this report was going to come not just from where you’d expect – from the government’s environment department – but also from the joint intelligence committee, and they are the UK’s spy chiefs, MI5, MI6, the intelligence agencies. And they were taking an interest in the climate and biodiversity and the threats that they pose to the UK’s national security.”

    Continue reading...

  • About 500 farmers challenge Green Gen Cymru in high court over alleged disregard for landowners and biosecurity

    A group of 500 Welsh farmers have brought a landmark legal claim to the high court over the alleged conduct of a green energy developer planning to build electricity pylon routes across their land.

    The court will hear allegations that Green Gen Cymru “unlawfully sought entry to private land, intimidated landowners, and showed disregard for biosecurity and basic rights”, as well as examine laws that force landowners to sell property to utility companies, in a hearing on Tuesday and Wednesday.

    Continue reading...

  • St Mabyn, Cornwall: Many apiarists opened their hives this spring to find hardly any sign of life. In Richard’s case, he found nothing at all

    Richard Bray’s hives stand in a crooked line at the edge of the apple orchard, beside a low thicket of nettles. Richard was “brought up with” beekeeping here at Haywood farm, and at the peak of his apiary business had 250 hives; today he has seven. This spring, for the first time in 75 years, none of his bees survived the winter.

    Richard lifts the lid of the first hive, releasing a sour smell of old wax and honey. “There’s nothing,” he says, “that’s very worrying. You’d expect to [at least] see dead bees in there. But there isn’t a bee anywhere.” An inspector from the National Bee Unit advised that the loss was caused by the varroa mite, a notorious destroyer of bee colonies. “I’ve never had anything like this,” Richard tells me. “Varroa mite? I don’t know.”

    Continue reading...

  • Donald Trump’s conflict with Iran could speed the EU’s green revolution – if panicking governments can hold their nerve on clean energy

    Don’t get This Is Europe delivered to your inbox? Sign up here

    A surge in demand for electric vehicles across Europe may be evidence of what George Monbiot greeted as the silver lining of the Iran war. Sales of electric cars in continental Europe rose by 51% in March.

    The International Energy Agency has called the disruption in the strait of Hormuz the “biggest energy crisis in history”, but it appears, on one level, to be accelerating Europe’s green revolution. Yet, even if car-owners are rushing to the EV showrooms, some European governments, facing a groundswell of anger over soaring petrol and gas prices, are at risk of sending the clean energy transition into reverse.

    Continue reading...

  • As rising gold prices fuel environmental destruction, communities in the country’s biodiverse heartland are passing laws against mining

    Mahogany trees tower above Herminio Mamani as he tends his cacao farm in Bolivia’s biodiverse north-west. A former president of El Ceibo, the country’s largest organic cacao co-operative, he says the agroforestry model used by its 1,300 members is vital not only to maintain the quality of the cacao they grow, which is used for chocolate and other products, but also for keeping gold mining at bay.

    “We cacao producers would never kill an animal here,” he says, parrots squawking nearby. “The parcels [of land] can never be monocultures – all the crops grow together.”

    Continue reading...

  • Analysis of video footage reveals how wave changed as it travelled over mud-rich rice paddies, exerting more force

    It is just over 15 years since the devastating Tohoku earthquake and tsunami struck Japan, killing almost 20,000 people and triggering the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster. Fresh analysis of video footage of the wave has revealed that the mud-rich coastline made the tsunami far more destructive than it might otherwise have been.

    Patrick Sharrocks, from the University of Leeds, and colleagues studied helicopter video footage, along with before and after images from Google Earth, to estimate the speed, shape and power of the tsunami flow front. They found that as the wave travelled over mud-rich rice paddies it changed from a fast-moving, clear-water flow into a thick, gloopy, mud-laden one.

    Continue reading...

Novosti: Cybermed.hr

Novosti: Biologija.com

Izvor nije pronađen